Evaluation of monetary policy in terms of exchange rate shock, MDSGE approach: The case of Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Abstract

In an open economy, the exchange rate is an important factor in the design of monetary policy. The nominal exchange rate may serve as the underlying objective of monetary policy in the short to medium term in its capacity as an intermediate target. The real exchange rate is of concern to policymakers not least because of its importance in determining the competitiveness of domestic goods in global markets, but because of its role as the driving force behind the expenditure switching effect. Many of studies also show that the real exchange rate directly affects behavior on the production side of the economy.
This paper underscores the importance of the direct exchange rate channel in the transmission of monetary policy effects in an open economy forward looking model. In fact, we study the impact of exchange rate shock on macroeconomic variables such as inflation and output in the context of incomplete exchange rate pass-through, using a new Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model with microeconomic foundations for a small open economy, adjusted for Iran. DSGE models as one of the major developments in macroeconomics in the past few decades are based on the adoption of the inter-temporal utility maximization paradigm.
In our model, we assume that there are two economies. On the one hand, there is the domestic economy, designated as a small and open economy, and on the other hand, there is a foreign economy, considered considerably bigger compared to the domestic one and relatively closed. These features influence their mutual relations and it holds that the domestic economy does not influence the development in the foreign economy. In this paper, we model relations for the development in the domestic economy, and the rest of the world, i.e. the foreign economy, enters the model exogenously. In our model, it is assumed that the Central Bank minimizes a loss function, taking into account the deviation of inflation from its target, output stabilization. In addition, incomplete exchange rate pass-through has been considered by the means of nominal import price rigidity and modelling of the path which exchange rate changes affect the economy.
 In line with our purpose, two kinds of policies based on discretion and commitment are introduced into the model. Period by period optimization and the treatment of expectations as being fixed characterize discretionary policymaking in the forward looking framework. The first characteristic implies that the policymaker sets policy anew every period. The other characteristic suggests that the policymaker treats the expectations of agents as constants when re-optimizing every period. But Commitment implies that the policymaker follows a rule systematically. In view of the fact that the policymaker cares about deviations of inflation from target and deviations of the real output gap from its target level, the policy rule focuses on the two target variables.
Bayesian methods have been applied in order to estimate structural parameters of the model. To do so, we have used Central Bank's data during 1369-1393. Then, the model is simulated under two policies of discretion and commitment and the effect of exchange rate shocks on key economic variables in these two situations is compared.
The results of the research indicate that the initial effect of exchange rate shock on all variables is roughly the same in both scenarios, but in discretion mode it takes more time to regain long-term balance. Our analysis also reveals that the output-inflation trade-off is more favorable under commitment than under discretion in part because of the existence of the direct exchange rate channel, and the stabilization bias under discretion is weaker in an open economy relative to a closed economy. These results confirm the importance of the exchange rate in the design and implement of monetary policy.

Keywords


توکلی، اکبر و سیاح، محسن (1389). «تأثیر نوسانات نرخ ارز بر فعالیت‌های اقتصادی کشور»، فصلنامه پول و اقتصاد، 4: 123-153.
خوشبخت، آمنه و اخباری، محمد (1386). «بررسی فرآیند اثرگذاری تغییرات نرخ ارز بر تورم قیمت مصرف کننده و واردات»، پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 7 (27): 51-82.
صادقی، سمیه و محمودزاده، محمود (1396). «انتخاب نظام ارزی بهینه برای اقتصاد ایران: رویکرد DSGE»، مجله تحقیقات اقتصادی، دوره 52، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 118، صفحه 139-162
کمیجانی، اکبر و توکلیان، حسین (1391). «سیاست‌گذاری پولی تحت سلطه ی مالی و تورم هدف ضمنی در قالب یک مدل تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی برای اقتصاد ایران». فصلنامه­ی تحقیقاتمدلسازیاقتصادی، 8 (2): 117-86.
Bartolomeo, G. D.; Pietro, M. D. and Giannini, B. (2017). “Optimal monetary policy in a New Keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 73: 373-387.
Dib, A. (2001). “An Estimated Canadian DSGE Model with Nominal and Real Rigidities”. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36: 949-72.
Gali, J. A. and Monacelli, T. (2005). Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Vola-tility in a Small Open Economy. NBER Working Papers 8905.
Lucas, R.E. (1977). Understanding Business Cycles, In Stabilization of the domestic and international economy, ed. Karl Brunner and Allan H. Meltzer, Carnigie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 5, Amsterdam: North Holland; pp. 7-29.
Motl, T. and Vasicek, O. (2011). A DSGE Model View of the Czech Business Cycle. Research Center for Competitiveness of Czech Economy, WORKING PAPER č. 01/2011, ISSN 1801-4496.
Monacelli, T. (2003). Monetary policy in a low pass-through environment. Working Paper Series 227, European Central Bank.
Ncube, M. and Ndou, E. (2011). Inflation Targeting, Exchange rate Shochs and Output: Evidence from South Africa. (Working Paper Series, N0. 134). Retrieved from African Development Bank website: free-doc-lib.com/.../working-paper-134-inflation-targeting-exchange-rate-shocks-1.pdf
Pfeifer, J. (2014). An Introduction to Graphs in Dynare. Tech. rep. University of Mannheim.
Polodoo, V.; Seetanah, B. and Padachi, K. (2011). Exchange rate Volatility and Macroeconomic Performance in Small Island Developing States (The UOM- WCP International Conference at Meridien). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2078443.
Polodoo, V.; Seetanah, B. and Padachi, K. (2011). Exchange rate Volatility and Macroeconomic Performance in Small Island Developing States (The UOM- WCP International Conference at Meridien). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2078443.
Razafindrabe, T. (2014). A multi-country DSGE model with incomplete Exchange Rate pass-through: application for the Euro area. EconomiX Working Papers 2014-6, Affiliation: University of Paris West - Nanterre la Défense, EconomiX.
Svensson, Lars E.O. and Woodford, M. (2003). “Indicator Variables for Optimal Policy”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3): 691-720
Senbeta, S. R. (2011). A Small Open Economy New Keynesian DSGE Model for a Foreign Exchange Constrained Economy. Department of Economics, University of Antwerp Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1812743 or http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1812743
Taylor, J. B. (1999). Monetary Policy Rules, Chicago: Chicago U. Press.
Thornton, H. (1802). An Inquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain, London: Hatchard.
Vitola, K. and Ajevskis, V. (2011). Fixed Exchange Rate Versus Inflation Targeting Evidence from DSGE Modeling (Working paper, Latvijas Bank, ISBN 9984-676, 54-4). Retrieved from http://www.bank.lv/images/ stories/pielikumi/ publikacijas/ petijumi/WP_2-2011-Ajevskis-Vitola.pdf
Vukotić M. (2008). Exchange rate dynamics in an estimated small open economy DSGE model. Mimeo. Duke University, (https://www 2.warwick. ac.uk/fac/soc/ economics/staff/mvukotic/exchange.pdf
Wickremasinghe, G. and Silvapulle, P. (2003). “Role of Exchange Rate Volatility in Exchange Rate Pass-Through to Import Prices: Some Evidence from Japan”, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University: 1-29.
Walsh, Carl E. (2003). “Speed Limit Policies: The Output Gap and Optimal Monetary Policy”. American Economic Review, 93(1): 265-78.
Wijnbergen, S. V. (1989). “Exchange Rate Management and Stabilization Policies in Developing Countries”. Journal of Development Economics, 23: 227-247.
Zeman, R.Z.; Senaj, M.M. and Sloveska, N.B. (2008). Modeling the development of the Slovak economy using a basic DSGE model. Economic Modeling Journal, 16.